Technalysis Research
 
Previous Blogs

February 28, 2017
The Messy Path to 5G

February 24, 2017
AMD Launches Ryzen CPU

February 21, 2017
Rethinking Wearable Computing

February 17, 2017
Samsung Heir Arrest Unlikely to Impact Sales

February 14, 2017
Modern Workplaces Still More Vision Than Reality

February 10, 2017
Lenovo Develops Energy-Efficient Soldering Technology

February 7, 2017
The Missing Map from Silicon Valley to Main Street

January 31, 2017
The Network vs. The Computer

January 27, 2017
Facebook Adds Support For FIDO Security Keys

January 24, 2017
Voice Drives New Software Paradigm

January 20, 2017
Tesla Cleared of Fault in NHTSA Crash Probe

January 17, 2017
Inside the Mind of a Hacker

January 13, 2017
PC Shipments Stumble but Turnaround is Closer

January 10, 2017
Takeaways from CES 2017

January 3, 2017
Top 10 Tech Predictions for 2017

2016 Blogs

2015 Blogs

2014 Blogs


2013 Blogs

















TECHnalysis Research Blog

March 7, 2017
Cars Need Digital Safety Standards Too

By Bob O'Donnell

When it comes to using your digital devices, physical safety is probably one of the few things you don’t have to worry about. Sure, the occasional overheating battery can be a problem, but generally speaking, you don’t see a whole lot of need, nor requests, for detailed safety requirements for digital gadgets.

In the automotive world, on the other hand, there is an enormous range of different safety standards and requirements that must be met before a particular vehicle can even be sold, let alone used. The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), which are developed and enforced by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), for example, include hundreds of detailed requirements that automakers must meet in order for a car to be eligible for sale in the US.

Importantly, these rules are intended to help maintain the safety of passengers inside the vehicle, as well as pedestrians and other people near the vehicle (such as passengers in other cars).

As cars continue to evolve, they are morphing into the most sophisticated digital devices we own (or at least use), yet unlike most electronic devices, they still represent an enormous potential safety hazard to both people and property. So, do we need to start outlining safety and security standards for the specific digital components of modern vehicles? Given the car hacking incidents that have already occurred, and the concerns about the potential for even worse ones, it seems the obvious answer is yes.

To its credit, much of the automotive industry does follow a functional safety standard for vehicle electronics called ISO 26262. Developed by the International Organization for Standardization (referred to as ISO), the standard incorporates a number of guidelines for how different electronic subsystems (both hardware and software) should work on their own, and along with other subsystems in the vehicle. In addition, ISO 26262 outlines four Automotive Safety Integrity Levels (ASIL) that rank these systems on their potential risk level, from the lowest at ASIL Level A to the highest at ASIL Level D.

As robust a mechanism as these standards may appear to represent, however, they don’t necessarily take digital security issues into account. For example, there’s no standard way to ensure the integrity of “over-the-air” upgrades to the incredibly complex software that is now found in today’s cars. While very few carmakers are currently doing software upgrades to their vehicles (unfortunately), that will undoubtedly change soon. In addition, as we start to see more advanced data and services being delivered both to and from the car thanks to technologies like 5G networks, there will be a critical need for ensuring the integrity of those communications.

Many advanced assisted and autonomous driving features also require the coordination of multiple different subsystems within a vehicle, but there aren’t sufficient standards to ensure that those in-car communications aren’t compromised in any way either.

Admittedly, like trying to develop a security standard for IoT devices overall, creating digital security requirements for cars is no easy task. One major challenge, for example, will be to determine exactly which parts of an automotive digital security solution would need to be required, and which parts may simply be recommended (and, therefore, open to a variety interpretations by different car or component makers). The risk factor on hacked cars is so high, it’s essential that the work be done though. In fact, I wouldn’t be terribly surprised to see federal or state legislation that starts to demand certain automotive security requirements be met before more advanced cars can be sold.

The physical safety standards for cars have been around for 50 years and are a widely accepted and essential part of the automotive industry. What needs to happen now is a similar level of effort and acceptance on standardizing the safety and security-related digital components at the heart of today’s modern vehicles.

Here's a link to the column: https://techpinions.com/cars-need-digital-safety-standards-too/49072

Bob O’Donnell is the president and chief analyst of TECHnalysis Research, LLC a market research firm that provides strategic consulting and market research services to the technology industry and professional financial community. You can follow him on Twitter @bobodtech.

Podcasts
Leveraging more than 10 years of award-winning, professional radio experience, TECHnalysis Research participates in regular audio podcasts in conjunction with the team at Techpinions.com.
LEARN MORE
  Research Offerings
TECHnalysis Research offers a wide range of research deliverables that you can read about here.
READ MORE